At Indus Journal of Law and Social Sciences, we uphold the highest standards of academic integrity and strive to ensure the accuracy and credibility of all published content. In the event that errors or inaccuracies are identified in any published work, we have established a transparent and rigorous correction policy to address such issues promptly and effectively.

1. Reporting Errors:
We encourage readers, authors, reviewers, and other stakeholders to promptly report any errors, inaccuracies, or concerns regarding published content to the editorial team of the Indus Journal of Law and Social Sciences. Reports can be submitted via email or through our online submission system.

2. Assessment of Corrections:
Upon receiving a report of an error or inaccuracy, the editorial team will thoroughly assess the validity and significance of the reported issue. This may involve consulting with the authors, reviewers, and relevant experts to verify the accuracy of the reported information and determine the appropriate course of action.

3. Correction Process:
If the reported issue is confirmed to be valid and significant, appropriate corrections will be made to the published work in accordance with established editorial policies and guidelines. Corrections may include errata notices, corrections to the online version of the article, or, in exceptional cases, retraction of the article.

4. Transparency and Accountability:
We are committed to transparency and accountability in our correction process. Any corrections made to published content will be clearly documented and prominently displayed on the Indus Journal of Law and Social Sciences website, along with an explanation of the nature of the error and the corrective action taken.

5. Notification of Corrections:
Upon the issuance of a correction, relevant parties, including authors, readers, and subscribers, will be promptly notified of the correction via email and/or through appropriate channels of communication. This ensures that stakeholders are informed of any updates or revisions to the published work.

6. Appeals Process:
Authors who disagree with the editorial decision regarding a correction request may appeal the decision by providing additional evidence or arguments to support their case. The editorial team will carefully review any appeals and consider them in accordance with established editorial policies and principles of academic integrity.

7. Continuous Improvement:
We are committed to continuously improving our correction policies and practices based on feedback from our stakeholders and emerging best practices in scholarly publishing. By fostering a culture of transparency, accountability, and responsiveness, we aim to uphold the trust and confidence of our readers and the academic community.